Sunday, March 2, 2025

Citrus and Research


Remember when I said the blooms on our mandarin orange tree never fully open? Well, never mind. The tree is now covered with lots of lightly-scented white flowers. It's still indoors, and maybe the flowers last better inside rather than out. Just a guess. We'll see if this brings us any fruit!

I worked in the garden all morning yesterday, neatening things up after the gardeners' visit during the week. It may seem silly that I needed to do anything at all, but there were some jobs I didn't ask them to tackle (like deadheading all the hydrangeas) and others that needed some minor tweaks.

For example, we have a large Hebe bush in the back garden and although they cleared the ivy all around it, they didn't clear under the bush. So I wanted to neaten that up. I trimmed the frost-nipped leaves off the banana, cut down the tall grasses to prepare them for a new year of growth, cut down the last of the teasels, trimmed some of the ferns, stuff like that.

Altogether I filled three yard waste bags, and I think now we're going to order some mulch to help keep weeds down where the ivy has been cleared. (Since the gardeners removed all my carefully preserved fallen leaves -- argh!)


While I did all this, the lady of the house lay in the sunshine nearby for some strenuous napping. I love seeing her enjoying her sunbathing for another year. It wasn't particularly warm (48º F or 9º C) but the sun was bright and I didn't feel cold at all -- and apparently neither did she.

I also did three loads of laundry -- still catching up after Florida -- and caught up in blogland. I particularly enjoyed the vigorous debate at John Gray's blog about Trump and Zelenskyy. (And is it Zelenskyy or Zelensky? Different sources spell it different ways. Remember how, in the '80s, no one could decide how to spell Muammar Gadaffi's name using a Western alphabet? A problem that evidently persists even now.)

I find it so interesting that Trump supporters often say "don't trust the media" and "do your own research." What constitutes research in their minds? I doubt they're reading through primary source documents or interviewing participants in world events. They're simply reading alternative media, or more likely spreading it via shares on Facebook and Twitter. That's not research.

Some high-profile scandals and missteps over the years have given people reason to mistrust the media, but professional news organizations -- especially those that attempt some degree of objectivity -- are still the best sources of fact-based information out there. A lot of professionally trained people have a hand in news presented via The New York Times or The Guardian or the Times of London or the BBC or CNN, whereas something posted on Facebook or a 4Chan message board may come from just one person with no editor and no real idea what they're talking about. I know that sounds like a very old-fashioned perspective -- particularly regarding objectivity, a word we seldom hear these days -- but having toiled in this field myself for many years I understand the industry and I can tell you reporters and editors at reputable news sources, for the most part, are trying their best to tell it like it is. I'll trust them any day over a possibly doctored video or some snippet of "fact" floating around online.

I do think there's value in reading a variety of professional news sources, which is why I read some on the right (and even the far right) as well as the left. Different perspectives can be helpful. But you've got to consider your source, and again, I wouldn't call that "research." It's just more media from another viewpoint.

Last night Dave and I watched "The Substance," the movie for which Demi Moore is nominated for an Oscar. It's a sort of dystopian horror film about a mysterious medical treatment that can restore youthful beauty, but at a terrible cost. There's quite a bit of blood but it was riveting and we both enjoyed it. It questions society's expectations about appearance, particularly for women, and takes the consequences to an absurd level. Some of those scenes are going to live in my mind for quite a while, for better or worse!

55 comments:

  1. Gardening in the sunshine is quite therapeutic. Something to calm the senses in these days of turmoil.
    I am putting off deadheading our hydrangeas for a while. Perhaps in a week or so if the frosts don't return.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really enjoyed (and needed) my garden time this weekend!

      Delete
  2. Interesting reflections on objectivity and news sources. Funny how Satan used to bang on all the time about "fake news" and yet he is responsible for the unbridled broadcasting of false figures that he appears to have plucked from thin air - such as his own popularity "numbers" and the figure of £350 billion that he claims America has spent to support Ukraine. This is wildly inflated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He just makes stuff up and adheres to the fantasy that the more he repeats it, the truer it becomes.

      Delete
  3. In our visual world where "perfection" is often shown, and real things hidden, it is hard to find the truth, I agree with you many people just look to a source which they agree with. As for the film subject, I can not understand what so many people are doing to their bodies to enhance their looks or to stay young. As I age I find myself withdrawing for so many aspects of life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Plastic surgery has always been a mystery to me, but the looks that seem fashionable nowadays are not what I would call attractive.

      Delete
  4. Thank you for the details on fact checking. A while ago, I sat in a lecture where a group of journalists from different media outlets explained the verification methods, double checking, source identification etc. and I would recommend it to anyone who just states "on the internet" or "this media (insert xyz) always lies".
    It's lovely to have spring sunshine, even if it's still cold.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a general rule, articles are better and more reliable when they've been through several layers of editing. That's something that very little "content" gets nowadays.

      Delete
  5. I’ve wondered about The Substance. It sounds interesting but I don’t know that I want to plant that in my mind. The garden looks so much better after your loving touch. I’m in love with Olga. Can’t believe you’ve got flowers on your orange tree indoors. So hoping you get fruit, too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We have one very small, very pathetic fruit. We'll see how much it matures!

      Delete
  6. Nothing happier than a dog, or a cat, sunning themselves.
    I cannot read or watch any rightwing news because it makes my head explode with the things they say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand that. I find it weirdly entertaining even though I know it's all lies and the lying also makes me furious. I can't explain it.

      Delete
  7. Lovely Olga doing the important thing! Dogs are for lying in the sun, to quote Snoopy..

    ReplyDelete
  8. I never got to see the Substance at the cinema although was on the verge of going several times. I got a bit put off by the thought of those lasting images and then by the time I made the decision to go it was only showing late at night. I see that locally it is still showing but at night only. Good to see the sunshine here too. My cats are doing as Olga, laying outside in it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is quite gruesome in places but also really entertaining. At the end it's so over the top it's almost laughable. I wasn't sure how I was supposed to feel.

      Delete
  9. I agree totally about the proper research from news sources. Too many people are getting their news from unreliable sources.
    Sounds like you had a good day in the garden. I was outside most of yesterday too but it was a lot warmer than 48 degrees. My friend and I cut short our day at the Indian Market because it was getting too warm out in the sun.
    I've been curious about that movie. I'm not sure I'm ready to watch it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't imagine being too warm! We're a long way from that.

      Delete
  10. Misinformation and disinformation is rampant these days. I get a lot of info from Heather Cox Richardson who always cites her sources.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I like HCR even though I don't often read her. She seems responsible.

      Delete
  11. The Substance looks interesting to me, a variation on the Dorian Gray theme, exploring the idea that women lose their value (or feel that they have) as they age. John's comments were interesting. It seemed that the people who stayed anonymous were simply there to say outrageous things and stir the pot. I loved the comment about the US being kicked out of the EU. Your response was hilarious. But, yes...a lot of these people simply don't know what they are talking about, but have some mighty strong opinions on the topic. Interestingly enough, I've begun to rely heavily on news sources outside the country. BBC Unspun is one. Radio Free Europe is another. That is actually something that I meant to ask you: When you were home, did you notice any differences in the nightly news?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I actually didn't watch much news when I was in the states. I didn't have time! I don't do TV news as a rule -- I get almost all my news from reading the NYT and several other mainstream outlets.

      Delete
  12. I don't know if I can watch The Substance because of what it says about women and our bodies. It seems that once girls hit puberty, our bodies are no longer our own. Have to think on this more.
    I read Reuters, BBC, and Al Jeerza news as well as North American news.
    Lovely to see Olga enjoying the sun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I think that's actually the point of the movie -- the way society "discards" women as they age, and ultimately turns them into no more than pieces of meat.

      Delete
    2. (I use that phrasing because if the visuals in the movie.)

      Delete
  13. I do not think I will be watching The Substance.
    Hey! You and I were both doing the same thing yesterday! Working outside in the sun. So lovely.
    It has seemed to me that even before the election, the NYT's did not seem to hold Trump as accountable for his lies as they should have. I can understand the need to present all sides of an issue but a lie is a lie if it can be fact checked and found as so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know many people feel they went too soft on Trump and perhaps questioned Biden's age too stridently. I personally didn't feel that way -- the NYT has challenged Trump from the beginning, both editorially and in its news content. But I think it's interesting that both the right and the left question the NYT's content. There's a rule of thumb in journalism that if neither "side" is happy, you're doing something right!

      Delete
  14. Reading a number of different sources gives a better perspective but there is still bias and you have to use judgement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. You have to know your source and where it's coming from.

      Delete
  15. I wish I could smell your mandarin blossoms! I really hope you get some fruit from them. I also wish I could reach through the screen and stroke Olga, soaking up those rays.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Your garden is looking good. When all the snow is gone, I'll be thinning overgrown plantings and removing tree branches that fell to the ground over the Winter.
    I like black bark mulch because it provides a nice backdrop for the plantings as well as defines each garden space, retains moisture and keeps weeds down. When I hire a tree contractor to take down a dangerous tree, I tell them they can leave the woodchips because I can spread the chips on pathways. Free natural chips are useful.
    US TV news seems censored and/or slanted. I find newspapers do not always provide both sides of a story. The issues today are complex, and reporting should be balanced and fact checked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We ordered conifer bark chips, so that's what we'll be using too. I ordered 10 100-liter bags to start. We'll see how far that gets us!

      Delete
  17. Mainstream media used to tell the truth. No more. I offer this CBS article in evidence.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-advisers-recall-what-led-up-to-oval-office-confrontation-volodymyr-zelenskyy/

    Here's a paragraph. They shared disbelief over what one source characterized as Zelenskyy badgering the president. Another official said that, had Zelenskyy kept his disagreements behind closed doors, the blowup wouldn't have happened.

    "They" are Trump's advisors. One, Zelenskyy did not badger. Two, Trump and Vance started the disagreements in public. Trump could have had the press removed, but he did not do it. CBS makes no mention of these things, just presents the admin side of things as truth.

    It's not just the the press is bending the knee, it's the stuff that you never see presented at all. I haven't seen anything about Vance being run out of a ski resort in Vermont and having to retreat to an undisclosed location. That seems news worthy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You and I agree on Trump in every respect, Allison, but I don't read the CBS article that way. It says (even in the headline) that the account comes from Trump's advisors and that the "badgering" was a characterization by one of them. In the next paragraph it states outright that "Trump and Vance took an aggressive and sometimes belittling tone" with Zelensky -- with no attribution, because that is indeed observable fact.

      In other words, the article presents the advisors' account of the meeting, based on their discussions afterwards, and then (I think) makes clear that their account is not entirely complete. Know what I mean?

      CBS, the BBC, the Boston Globe, The Guardian and others have had stories about Vance and the Vermont protests. I could have sworn the NYT had it too but I can't find it now so maybe not yet. The NYT's unofficial approach to many stories seems to be sacrificing speed for depth.

      Delete
    2. This morning when I was brushing my teeth, thinking about Vance being run out of town in Vermont, I began to wonder if I'd fallen for a fake AI story. I had not seen it covered in the press. So I looked again, and it was covered. So, I was wrong on that subject.

      Delete
  18. I've heard that the movie is hard to watch. I still want to see "Conclave" which my older daughter recommended highly. We've definitely become a nation of propaganda and it seems to mostly come from the right wing? Or does that show my own bias?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Hard to watch" is a good way to put it, but it was certainly never boring!

      Delete
  19. Good to get out in the sunshine.
    Maybe help citrus fruiting with a little pollenating by paintbrush?

    ReplyDelete
  20. There's a site that ranks news organizations regarding bias and trustworthiness. I'll see if I can track it down. It really is hard to know what to believe - even the places telling us actual facts seem to do it in such a biased way. Oof.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here it is - but it doesn't actually assess trustworthiness: https://www.allsides.com/media-bias

      Delete
    2. Yeah, I've seen that site before. Our former librarian used to show it to students to help them gauge the perspective of their sources. I think it's interesting that they put the NYT at center-left and the BBC right in the middle. To hear the right-wingers in the UK tell it, the BBC is practically communist!

      Delete
  21. I do think you are spot on about the media. The reliable sources are standbys, have been for years for the most part with journalists -- real journalists. These days you have to fact check everything and there are good sites to do it. Too many people don't use them.
    Love that you were so productive in the garden. Although your supervisor looks like she's sleeping on the job. Well, you can only do that when you have confidence the work is being done well!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm just mystified about what "research" these people believe they're doing. I'd love to know the details.

      Delete
  22. Are you still watching Severance? We're all caught up and now have to wait a week between episodes which I'm not happy about! I'm really enjoying it but besides you I don't know anyone else who's watching it and I have no one to talk it over with!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We ARE watching "Severance"! We just finished Episode 6, I think? (We just learned that Irv isn't dead, at least not his "outie.") We're enjoying it but it's definitely a mind-bender!

      Delete
  23. So cool that your mandarin tree is blossoming! I wonder if it will fruit as well. Love the picture of Olga soaking up the sun. That must have felt good on her bones.

    I read widely to try to get as many takes on a situation as possible, and I look for sources and background information to support what I'm reading. But I have the luxury of time and access, which many do not, and they end up voting as they always have, not realizing that the Republican party has completely changed, or they follow social media and live in a bubble of misinformation and disinformation. It's a sad and sorry state of affairs, and we are seeing the result in real time now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It already has a fruit -- a sad little thing, but better than nothing. It's trying!

      I think you're right about people voting as they always have. That's certainly true of many Republicans I know.

      Delete
    2. Clearly my brain was not engaged when I left this comment - I remember now that you wrote about the fruit on the mandarin tree. That was only a short time ago! Is this how dementia begins?

      Delete
  24. I wrote Zelenskyy's name with a double yy this morning, but it seemed unfamiliar. I double checked, and it was correct. Now I understand why I was doubtful.

    Mandarin blooms are pretty and delicate looking.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, it depends who you ask. Some news sources are now using one Y. I genuinely don't know what's correct!

      The Associated Press, which for many years has been the arbiter of newspaper style, uses two Ys and says that's how Zelenskyy himself spells it.

      Delete
  25. I hope you do get mandarins this year, the blossoms have a lovely scent as I remember from when I rented a house that had a mandarin tree in the back yard. I shall head over to that link to read, but first let me say I feel ashamed at the way Trump and Vance "ganged up" on Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish I could plant our mandarin tree outside. I'm sure it would be happier outdoors in a place with warmer weather!

      Delete
  26. Like many things politically, I find myself in a gray portion of the world that many feel is black and white. I find the majority of media to be factual in what they say but those same places tend to steer those that read/watch their articles by omitting other facts or using politically loaded terminology meant to play with our emotions. It is rare to find a news source that eschews the use of loaded terminology and actually concentrates on trying to present a balanced article with thoughts on both sides of an issue, leaving it up to the reader to decide where they fall instead of being directed towards one side of the other. The only one I have found is ReadTangle.com.

    Not surprisingly, I have mixed feelings on the Trump/Zelensky affair. I think Zelensky poked the bear and then the bear made an ass of himself. Both probably share some of the blame though I tend to assign the lesser blame to Zelensky. Regardless of that, I mostly wonder why we are even inserting ourselves into Ukrainian affairs at all. It serves us nothing except picking a fight with Russia and I'm not sure that is a benefit to us right now. Many bring up the humanitarian side of this and I agree but then ask, why don't we insert ourselves in the many other humanitarian crisis in other countries around the world? I would rather ask the question, "is it our responsibility to get in the middle of every humanitarian crisis when we can't even deal with our own humanitarian crisis?"

    ReplyDelete