Remember the collapsed bench outside the telephone exchange on Finchley Road? Well, it's still there, three months later, along with its orange conical sentries standing at attention.
Someone stuck a sticker to the back that says "The Museum of Postmodernism." I don't think there is any such museum in London, so that's a pretty deliberate (and funny) comment about its longtime presence as a street sculpture.
I've just been outside refilling all the bird feeders. Those birds can really plow through food. I do feed them less in the summer, recognizing that they need to learn to forage for themselves (among the bolognaise discarded at the back of the garden) and probably also need to know when to migrate as food dwindles. But on weekends I like to watch them on the feeders. It occurred to me that 7 a.m. may be a bit early for the squabbling starlings, but hopefully the neighbors will forgive me.
It's starting to feel quite autumnal out there. Our low temperature is 54º F at night (that's 13º C) and the highs are 72º F during the day (an ideal 23º C). But more than that, there's something about the air -- a crisp edge that suggests the coming of fall. Or maybe it just feels that way to me because I'm back at school.
I spent much of yesterday in the Lower School re-shelving books and putting things in order. I think both libraries are in pretty good shape and ready for the onslaught of kiddies come Tuesday. (Monday is a bank holiday, thank God.)
I have a couple of goals this weekend: I want to go take some pictures; I want to finish this book about ABBA that I've been reading for two weeks (it's mostly just been sitting on my end table next to the couch, but it's not bad and I'd like to finish it); I want to plan some trips for our break periods in the autumn. Plus I need to do the routine weekend stuff like laundry and watering all the houseplants. Our rubber trees have been sitting outside all summer and I suppose I need to think about bringing them inside again, though we won't have any really cold temperatures for another couple of months.
This column in The New York Times really annoyed me, in which David Brooks blames liberals and progressives for the right wing's nihilistic, destructive tendencies. Apparently we overconfident, domineering liberals have beaten the poor conservatives into silent, seething submission, leaving them physically hunched over and unable to express their God-fearing perspectives, to such a degree that they have now decided to simply destroy everything. He holds up Curtis Yarvin and Christopher Rufo as examples of this trend, both of them right-wing extremists of the highest order. So it's my fault that Curtis Yarvin thinks the way he does? Talk about shifting responsibility!
I get so tired of this assertion that conservatives can't express themselves. Rush Limbaugh? Newt Gingrich? Jerry Falwell? Jon Voight? Ted Nugent? I've been hearing conservative voices for decades. I certainly didn't feel predominant in the culture during the terms of George W. Bush and Ronald Reagan.
And I loved this sentence: "For reasons I don’t fully understand, educated elites are more socially progressive than non-elites." Well, gee, could it be education?!
At least he ultimately comes out against nihilism, but his source of reassurance is statistics that show more young men going to church. Given the growth and persistence of Christian nationalism, I'm not entirely sure that's a good thing -- but I suppose we shall see.
Hello, my friend. It’s me again. I might be the only blogger from Southeast Asian countries among the fabulous bloggers from the US, Canada, Spain, Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, and many other European countries. I am so happy to be here with you all."
ReplyDeleteThis mix of humor, daily life, and sharp commentary The “Museum of Postmodernism” sticker on the bench is pricelesst perfectly captures how abandoned things can morph into unintentional public art.
Happy Weekend
I believe you are my only Southeast Asian blog follower! I'm glad you're here!
Delete"Well, gee, could it be education?" Duh!
ReplyDeleteRight?!
DeleteEducated elites are more socially progressive. Imagine that. The entire column sounds like an embarrassment. I’ll stick to that post-modern bench.
ReplyDeleteIt is an embarrassment. You should see the reader comments.
DeleteIs the large black box part of the post-modernist arrangement? Is it a waste bin or something to do with electricity or telecommunications? Anyway, the continued presence of that bench is ridiculous. One day it will go but will it be this year? Doubt it.
ReplyDeleteI doubt it too. It just shows how our local governments are struggling to do even the simplest things.
DeleteFrom my perspective, I don't see libraries being a part of the problem. Most of those that I interact with on the far right don't read books... at all. In fact, they hate libraries in general as another liberal ploy to give away their tax dollars to those that don't work and thus can't afford alternatives.
ReplyDeleteI also haven't seen them beaten into silent submission either as they have been pretty vocal since Trump's first presidency.
I for one am ready for a crispness to the air. We are supposed to get our first dose maybe starting today. Thanks to the far right, global warming has meant for a hot sticky summer thus far.
I think they've been vocal since even before Trump. Remember all the opposition to Clinton, the Whitewater and "Arkancide" allegations? All of that was driven by these same people.
DeleteThat's some good explanatory writing about New York Times piece. I think about how folk in a centre barren farming state feel about California and New York. That is the educated elite. I think there was an implied promise from #47 that he will make the lives of the poorer less educated better. Of course that is nonsense. Megalomaniac tyrants like #47 don't want people educated enough to question.
ReplyDeleteHe doesn't give a shit about poorer or less educated people. In Trump's mind they're all losers. He's just using them to achieve his own ends.
DeleteIf you were allowed fires in London, that old bench would have been snapped up by now for fuel.
ReplyDeleteIt's true! I'm surprised someone passing by hasn't done it. Lots of people driving along Finchley Road don't live in London.
DeleteI see that local council has set a new "benchmark" for underfunding maintenance!
ReplyDeleteNot sure about the question of feeding birds during the summer months. Some say they need to forage for themselves whilst others recommend making sure they have a secure, regular, year round supply of food, especially when raising their broods. Who knows?
I'm shooting for the middle ground -- I feed them sometimes.
DeleteAnd to top it off the felon is eliminating the Department of Education!
ReplyDeleteHe's a monster.
DeleteHmm, so is David happy to see men attend the church the flaming rear end HATEgseth of DOD attends? The one where women are told to submit to their leader husband and not be allowed to vote. What a place to find healing for their tender little souls. Poor little misogynists.
ReplyDeleteDid I mention I have a plaque that resided on my work desk for years that said, "Sarcasm...a free service provided here"?
Exactly -- what are these guys being taught at church? If it's Jesus' message to "love thy neighbor," that's one thing. But I suspect it's more like the message you mention above.
DeleteFuck David Brooks. Conservatives are just pissed that people are tired of their repressive policies, political and social, that they don't get to define what's socially acceptable anymore. Women, LGBTQetc, people of color are tired of being repressed. It's not that they are being silenced, it's that we aren't listening to them anymore. And we speak out about their hate speech and racism/bigotry where before we all just had to suffer in silence.
ReplyDeleteBut actually I think a lot of people still ARE listening. Conservatives always bang on about how no one lets them speak their minds, they're so repressed and discriminated against -- while still speaking their minds and spreading their message. They're not discriminated against at all. If anything, they're over-amplified.
DeleteOh, I meant to ask why you can't freeze the leftover bolognaise sauce and use it yourselves? Maybe you don't have a large enough freezer?
ReplyDeleteWhat a ridiculous article by David Brooks.
I'm glad it is cooling off a bit here and can't wait for Fall.
We're talking about a VERY small amount of meat sauce -- like, a couple of tablespoons. Not enough to save but too much to throw out if it can benefit a hungry animal.
DeleteDavid Brooks is one conservative who can generally be counted on for reasoned commentary, although that doesn’t sound the case here. For an interesting-and disheartening-perspective on how American politics got to where they are today, I recommend Robert Reich’s Coming Up Short. Margaret D (as I believe there is another Margaret commenting on your posts.)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the recommendation -- I don't know that book. I agree that Brooks is usually more palatable than most conservative commentators. Maybe he woke up on the wrong side of the bed on this particular day!
DeleteI can see why you'd be annoyed with such an idiotic column. Thinking in some areas has become completely twisted so that they delude themselves.
ReplyDeleteDeluded is the word!
DeleteBrooks has been rubbing us the wrong way for a while now. Moderate conservative, or so he claims, has landed him in insignificance, he is making noise now. I am a bit suspicious of any man married twice, divorced twice who weaves in and out of integrity. the way he does. Dennis bought his book "How To Know A Person" , Dennis used to be republican, you understand, the book even put him off. Brooks - no thanks.
ReplyDeleteYou're probably right that he's feeling pressure (like all Republicans) to not be too moderate. Nowadays if you're not making a splash on Twitter you're nobody!
DeleteSomewhere along the line, Brooks lost his way. Apparently he is now deeply mired in the woods. I can no longer read NYT, I cancelled in a fit of pique over a head line that offended me. It's just as well, getting through the front page of Washington Post and their pathetic "reporting" on Trump's thinking on Ukraine has already set my hair on fire.
ReplyDeleteI subscribe to both the Times and the Post, but I trust the Times more, given Bezos' intervention in the Post's editorial decisions. Neither of them are perfect by any means, but I still think the New York Times is the closest thing the USA has to a reliable news source.
DeleteI don't see any conservative, in the media or in real life, having difficulty expressing their idiocies.
ReplyDeleteWhat I need is people on the Left standing up louder.
Exactly! Who on the right is being stifled? I'm sure not seeing it!
DeleteI agree that conservative (and even ultra right wing neo Nazis) haven't been silenced at all; they've been very outspoken, especially lately, emboldened by this administration. Opinions that in the past would have been heinous and would have disqualified someone from any political office, job, etc. are now out there everywhere. T's assertion that slavery wasn't all bad?? I can't think about it too much or my head will explode! I've never read Brooks; my liberal father despised him though and was VERY vocal about that.
ReplyDeleteThere is no public shame anymore. These people can express any toxic position they want to, couch it in "freedom of speech," and their followers won't hold them accountable.
DeleteWhat Ellen said!! Let me see if I get this straight, Brooks is saying that because we liberals went to universities and became educated we are more socially progressive than the neanderthals that inhabit the ranks of conservatism, like Joe Rogan or Alex Jones? Really? How could that possibly happen? Nope, the MAGATS did this to themselves, the liberals had nothing to do with their problems.
ReplyDeleteIt sure isn't MY fault! LOL
DeleteI've always been mystified that people wonder why colleges and universities are generally thought of as being so liberal. It doesn't take a great mind to figure that out. And this is exactly why the current (fake!) administration is trying desperately to staunch education and scientific research.
ReplyDeleteSorry. That's all pretty obvious.
No, it's true! They hate education and critical thinking. It thwarts their ability to control their minions.
DeleteI started to read that op-ed, and quit after the opening paragraph. The NYT is publishing some questionable stuff these days. As Ms. Moon said about colleges and unis... Education fosters awareness and thought! Oh, the horror.
ReplyDeleteI think the NYT is trying to capture the zeitgeist, including opinions they know will be controversial. I understand why they publish what they do. But that doesn't mean it won't piss me off! LOL
DeleteWe all see the Felon is attempting to have more control over major US Universities. Research funding is being withheld. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion departments are under threat (per Felon, abandon them or lose Federal money).
ReplyDeleteEducation guarantees knowledge and encourages free thinking and speech. It is all under threat by the Conservative faction.
The NYT article is biased and unbalanced.
.
And it's a classic Republican ploy, when things go wrong, to turn around and say, "Well, this is all the liberals' fault!"
Delete"David Brooks blames liberals and progressives for the right wing's nihilistic, destructive tendencies. Apparently we overconfident, domineering liberals have beaten the poor conservatives into silent, seething submission, leaving them physically hunched over and unable to express their God-fearing perspectives, to such a degree that they have now decided to simply destroy everything." Wow, sounds a lot like the victim blaming that happens when women are assaulted by men, or raped by men, or killed by men. Not taking any accountability at all. I'm tired of old white men and their fucking opinions.
ReplyDeleteI am too. Both parties need fresh blood and diversity of leadership and opinions. I'm sick to death of people the age of Trump and Biden running the country.
DeleteFool Brooks still trying to pull a pay check. Moving right along, that bench and cones is in itself the museum of postmodernism. I love it. People should pose in front of it as a tourist attraction.
ReplyDeleteYes, I think it pretty much IS the Museum of Postmodernism, since there is no such institution in London!
DeleteI usually like David Brooks' writing and commentary, even though he has a conservative bent (less so than before). But he appears (or usually appears) a little more reasoned than most conservatives. But that article really bugged me for the same reasons as you. It felt very un-Brooks. And very, very wrong. On every level. The Museum of Postmodernism is brilliant!
ReplyDeleteIt's just such an obvious example of blaming the opposition when things go wrong (or "tits up," as the British say).
DeleteDavid Brooks just annoys me in general. Every now & then he sounds reasonable, but then he does stuff like this.
ReplyDeleteHe's written columns in the past that I've enjoyed and agreed with, but he's way off base with this one.
DeleteDo not get me started on so called "Christian Nationalism". There's nothing Christian about it AT ALL!
ReplyDeleteI'm ready for some cooler weather and rumor has it we'll get some next week. I'll take it!
And that's so true with a lot of modern evangelical Christianity. I feel certain Jesus would not recognize it as any movement that he started!
Delete