Monday, June 15, 2026

A Walk and an Inability to Center


I worked on my slides all morning yesterday, and managed to go through all the boxed slide cartridges. I looked at every slide, chose about 45 to scan, and packaged up the rest in a plastic tub according to the organizational scheme I described yesterday. And then I vacuumed the corner where those cartridges were stacked, because those things were filthy. It will be a miracle if I don't get hantavirus.

After that I needed some exercise, so I took a long walk over to Hampstead Heath Extension and up into Hampstead Garden Suburb. I came across the tree above in the wild part of Golder's Hill Park. I think it's a redwood, or some kind of cedar maybe. Not very typical for this area. It reminded me of Georgia O'Keeffe's painting "The Lawrence Tree."

It felt great to get out and walk and I was struck by how much I'm still missing Olga. The fireweed is blooming on the Heath and that brought tears to my eyes, because I took so many pictures of her romping in front of it. It's been almost a year since she died, which is hard to believe. The pain seems recent, and yet it does seem a long time since I held and petted her. We are long overdue for another dog but we've got to hold out until our Italy trip is past, in late July.

It wasn't a sad walk, overall. In fact it was beautiful out -- dry and sunny and cool, very Mediterranean -- and I put on my music and had a great time thinking about London as my personal property. (That's one of the songs I heard on my iTunes!) I'm glad I got that walk out of my system because it's looking rainy again this morning.


And I had a close encounter with a slightly muddy fox! As you can see from the video, it was in a quite populated part of the park near the tiny Golder's Hill zoo. I feel like the fox whisperer, but I know it's just that those varmints are everywhere. You'll also see video of the blooming fireweed, also known as rosebay willowherb.

In the evening Dave and I watched our usual TV lineup, which has lately included "The Four Seasons" and "The Pitt," both of which we love. "The Pitt" is so good we're reluctant to stop it -- we often find ourselves bingeing a couple of shows together. We watched "The Boroughs" on Netflix, which wasn't bad, mainly because of the cast, but it wasn't as compelling as "Stranger Things" (an earlier project by the same filmmakers).

I'll close with a couple of the slides I came across yesterday. Remember how I mentioned that some photographers seem to have trouble framing their shots? Here are two excellent examples, both from the mid-1950s:


There's a person to the left of the woman in pink, and all we can see is a smidgen of their jacket. But thank goodness the photographer included that lamp! (I like the right-hand woman's bouquet of passionflowers.)


I don't mean to be snide about anyone's photographic ability, but COME ON, MAN! Why are we cutting the tops of people's heads off? Why include so much under the table?

Blogger Boud commented many posts back that with some of those old-style cameras, you couldn't always clearly see the parameters of your image in the viewfinder. I think something like that must be at fault here, because this person's framing is completely bonkers. The main subjects of many pictures tend to be shifted upward and to the left, which leads me to suspect the photographer was using a camera with the lens below and to the right of the viewfinder. Fortunately, I still have enough well-centered shots that I have some scannable images, which I will post to Flickr over the next few weeks.

51 comments:

  1. "I don't mean to be snide about anyone's photographic ability..." That reminds me of the intervention in an argument that begins with "With respect...". I may start referring to you as Mr Snide from now on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am definitely Mr. Snide from time to time. I admit it.

      Delete
  2. Haha, those photos. I wonder who the poor man who was completely cut off from the photograph was. But how lovely that we got to see the standard lamp. :-)

    It's almost two years since we lost our Pug and just over a year since we lost our JR, we talk about them all the time and still miss them dreadfully. We live in a very dog friendly town and there are dogs in every café we visit and everywhere we go. One day we will get another dog, but not just yet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's important to wait until the right time. I have actually enjoyed this dog-free period in many ways, but I also miss having one.

      Delete
  3. Sometimes when I walk near where I used to live, I think of my dear sweet Murphy. I miss seeing photos of Olga and reading about her antics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm curious about your plans for a new dog! Puppy or older dog? What kind? Rescue or breeder? Etc etc...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sure we'll get a rescue, and probably another staffy or staffy mix. There always seem to be tons of them waiting to be adopted.

      Delete
  5. Years ago I worked in a restaurant and a fellow server had an unruly, rude table. But they asked if she would take their photo and, this was before cell phones, she took the camera, framed the shot and just before the click the tilted the camera down so the heads would be chopped off.
    Then she felt guilty and gave them one more, hopefully full headed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! Well, I'm glad she gave them a better one, but hopefully they saw the first one too and got the message!

      Delete
  6. Rangefinder cameras were point and guess.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, that could very well be what was going on here!

      Delete
  7. That fireweed is so pretty. It's moments like that when the past sometimes comes and kicks us in the gut. But I'm glad it wasn't a sad walk.

    If the person taking the photo wasn't really adept with the camera, it's possible they lined it up and then the camera slipped a bit -- That could be a problem with an older, heavier slide camera. Or, maybe the lack of heads and "Uncle Bob" or whomever was at the right is the reason that slide ended up in the old slides pile. Might have been one of those photos that there were more than one of and the other was better. It will be interesting to see if it turns up deeper in the pile!

    I'm going through (dozens of) old photos albums these days -- scanning the good pix, sending many oldies to friends, and (to the point) realizing how I have evolved as a photographer. There are a lot of lousy images that were saved from those old days, lots (especially scenic) hitting the basket, never to see the light of scan. But back then, they were the best of the lot. Who knows?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, it IS true that these are discarded slides, and maybe they were tossed because of those sorts of framing mistakes. Who knows? I cleaned out my childhood photos in the mid-aughts and I threw away a ton of blurry, discolored, worthless images. We all have 'em!

      Delete
  8. We do not remember what it was like to take pictures and not be able to immediately view the captured image. We would send them off to be developed and wait a week to get them back only to discover a batch of stinkers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, those were the days, right?! I remember that disappointment when a photo didn't work out the way I thought it would.

      Delete
  9. It would be so disappointing to get the developed photos (or slides) back and find that a lot of the roll was absolutely no good at all!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Especially bad when you'd made some kind of mistake that affected all the pictures. For example, I remember setting my shutter speed incorrectly while using a flash for New Year's Eve in 1999, and all the photos were about a third black as a result.

      Delete
  10. I am not good at realizing I haven't gotten a photo framed correctly when I'm taking it which is one of the reasons I love digital. I can look immediately and reframe.
    I know you miss Olga. How could you not? Especially when you are surrounded by places you two visited together so many times.
    That fox doesn't look nearly as fine as the ones in your yard.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the fox was muddy. He seemed healthy enough, just wet and dirty!

      Delete
  11. That fox is headed right into a very large group of people. I'm not sure who will be more afraid. Those photos made me wince. My very first camera when I was about 13, was a Brownie with the view finder above the lens. I had to learn to adjust to make sure I didn't cut things off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The fox actually stopped and ran deeper into the brambles so to escape the crowd AND escape me. Living in a busy park I'm sure it's learned how to avoid people. I've seen Brownies but I've never used one!

      Delete
  12. that tree looks like it got topped somehow and instead of just one of the new sprouts taking dominance, two decided to share.

    Hard to believe it's been nearly a year since Olga died. End of July isn't that far away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, that could very well be what happened. It actually had a third trunk behind the two in the photo!

      Delete
  13. Your walk looks to be lovely plus its brough back many fond memories of walking with Olga.
    The photos are typical of the 50's, people dressed up. I remember my parents dressing for evenings out and special occasions.
    Your many backyard foxes are superbly groomed compared to the fox you saw on your walk.
    Photographic skills are definitely random. That said, with the technology today everybody takes a better picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, today's cameras are so much easier to use.

      Delete
  14. It makes sense to wait on a new dog until after your trip, but you seem more than ready to have one. Would you get a puppy? Do you gravitate towards certain breeds of dog? I cut off many people's heads in my early picture taking days. Can I blame it on the viewfinder? ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we'll get another staffy like Olga. They are terrific dogs. We'd probably get a young adult, not a small puppy. Puppies are a lot of work.

      Delete
  15. Oh, those 1950s dresses with the shiny, shiny material! Betcha they were of the new synthetics and were hot as hell.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good to have a fresh air walk and centre yourself.

    Rangefinder cameras have a lot of bad shots to answer for!! The difference when you change to SLR. But still only a few images per film worth keeping.
    I suppose that is the advantage of digital.. The ability to discard the rubbish and also to keep the best. You have to balance that against its disadvantage... The safety.. Or precariousness of digital storage.

    Looking at the group photos, thinking that their children could be the same age, as us now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, it's astonishing to see these pictures and think about how old these people would be. Easily 80 if any of them are still with us. As you said, their children could be our age.

      Delete
  17. I agree with Boud. I an old camera when I was a kid and nothing ever appeared how I had meant to frame it. We’re spoiled with out instant-approval cameras and also being able to take 10 shots to obtain only one. My mother was usually shorter than everyone she photographed so if she was standing and they were standing there were great shots looking up our noses with the tops of our heads cut off.

    It’s no surprise you still at times miss Olga so much. I miss her and I never even met her in person. Met her in dog?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I failed to mention how much I love that tree photo. A beautiful piece of art.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, I do remember having to shoot sparingly so as not to "waste film." Glad you like the tree!

      Delete
  18. That tree photo is great! It's exactly the kind of shot I'd be looking for. (no heads to lop off). You'll always miss Olga, but I'm looking forward to you having a new love in your life!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She will arrive in blogland already a star! LOL

      Delete
  19. walks are not as interesting without dog, I know this as fact...The last photo of "Dinner"- is most interesting from a painterly perspective. I love it- especially after cropping the other two people in shadow out of the picture. It is a very cool photo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It IS very painterly, I agree. I wasn't going to upload either of these to Flickr but in mocking them I came to enjoy them, so now they're in the gallery with all the rest.

      Delete
  20. It makes you wonder - was it because the viewfinder gave them an unwarranted confidence they had the shot and were disappointed weeks later when they got their slides, or did they over-adjust for the sh!tty way that the viewfinder did this to them and they were doubly disappointed weeks later when they got their slides? Lovely trees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, you gotta wonder what the thought process was! I'm sure they were ultimately disappointed, that's true.

      Delete
  21. The tree is very impressive.
    Perhaps the person was deliberately cut out of the photo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's possible! Old Uncle Frank who no one liked!

      Delete
  22. Chopped off heads are almost always caused by a heavy or too firm shutter finger causing the camera to dip at the crucial moment. I did that myself many, many times before I got a digital camera.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, it could have been that. It looks like the photographer was very close to the table too -- probably shooting in a small room and thus unable to back up far enough.

      Delete
  23. Well done on having taken that walk when you did. I have long made it a habit of grabbing any opportunity for a walk, as I rarely know what the weather, my schedule or other demands might be like tomorrow. On my deathbed I will not regret not having dusted and hoovered that morning, but I will regret not having gone for a walk when I could.

    Maybe the photographer of these pictures was extraordinarily proud of their lamp and armchair, and of the table :-D
    Seriously, my Grandma did exactly that. She only had a cheap little camera which was probably not exactly user-friendly in the first place, plus she had only one eye, the other one was glass, meaning her one-eyed view lacked perspective and made it difficult for her to centre.

    I finished "The Boroughs" on the weekend and quite liked it, mainly for its actors and acting. For me, the SciFi element was only part of the parcel; I focused more on the themes of getting older and how we as a society and as individuals handle ageing (our own and of other people) and dementia, and ultimately, our mortality.
    Here's a recommendation: "Joan", see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_(TV_series). I watched it (in English) on a German TV station's archive and don't know whether it's on Netflix or other streaming services you may have. For the 80s music and clothes alone it is worth watching, but I also like the acting, especially of Frank Dillane who I thought did GREAT as a teenager when he played 16-year old Tom Riddle (Lord Voldemort).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, I didn't even consider the possibility that the photographer's vision was somehow impaired, but that's certainly possible too!

      Thanks for the "Joan" recommendation! I haven't seen that one on our streaming services but I'll look for it. We should be able to get it straight from ITV, I think.

      Delete

  24. do you think that fox's dad was a tabby cat? Or am I seeing things that are not there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! Well, who knows, but I think it was just streaked with mud and water. It came out of a boggy area.

      Delete
  25. I think I'd forgotten these were the discarded slides, and we're finding out why!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Certainly could be part of the reason! But a lot of the pictures don't have these problems, so I think the whole batch was discarded more for lack of want than anything else.

      Delete