Sunday, February 9, 2025
More Memory Lane
Another old picture, this one from July 2011, the month we moved to London. I don't think I ever blogged it before -- at least, not that I could find. I don't remember where it was taken. Maybe Notting Hill or Queensway, near the flat where we were moving.
As you can probably tell, I spent part of yesterday looking through more archives. I'm trying to make sure everything that is on a CD has been moved to a portable hard drive, because how long are those CDs going to be accessible? I already have to borrow a CD player from work to read them. Pretty soon even that will be difficult.
Here are two more photos from the beginning of July 2011, right before we left the USA:
We drove first to Michigan, where we left our furniture to be sold and put some stuff in storage in Dave's parents' basement.
Here's Dave at the home where his family once lived on Grosse Ile. The funny thing about this picture is, they didn't live there at the time it was taken. They'd already sold it, but as I recall we went back to pick up an old bathtub from the garage. Dave's father wanted to install it in one of his rental properties. While we were there Dave apparently felt the need to water the new owners' garden. Why he did this is a complete mystery to me -- maybe the plants were looking desperate. And what's that that tripod on the lawn behind him? Looks like something that would be used by a land surveyor.
And here I am in Saugatuck, on Lake Michigan, where Dave and I caught the local Fourth of July parade. I remember this only because I blogged about it. I don't have that shirt anymore but I liked it -- I got it at the Bridgewater Commons mall in New Jersey. Lord & Taylor, I think, or maybe Bloomingdales.
It's kind of fun to root out these old photos that I'd completely forgotten about and show them the light of day.
What else did I do yesterday? Well, I read about 75 pages of "The Wager," which is really good. It's been fun to enjoy some non-fiction for a change. Reading about the perilous life of a seaman in the 1700s -- the lice, the typhus, the scurvy, the ever-present danger of falling overboard or getting tangled in the rigging, the rats, the filth -- makes me appreciate the luxury of my own life now. We don't know how good we have it, honestly. Just a couple of hundred years ago people lived truly hellish existences. (And still do in some places on our modern planet.)
Dave and I also went to the 50th birthday party of one of his co-workers. She had a little gathering at her flat in Lisson Grove, near St. Johns Wood. And when I say "little gathering," it was still too big for her microscopic flat. But we had fun and it was good to get out and socialize.
One of Dave's co-workers asked if I was still walking around the city with my camera as much. I said no, I haven't been, that I've been taking more photos with my phone these days. "They're almost as good as the camera photos," I said.
"But is it as satisfying?" she asked. And I thought, hmmmm...that's a good question. "No, it's not," I said. And maybe that's an aspect of photography that I've been missing lately -- the ability that the camera gives me to control more of the exposure. Something to think about. (It doesn't mean I will strap on the ten-pound camera and lens bag any more readily.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I no longer take a camera with me when I am out, unless I know I am visiting somewhere where there will be a distant view and I need the optical 40X zoom. I agree with you though, snapping with your phone is not as satisfying.
ReplyDeleteIt just feels too easy, though I suppose we're still using our "photographic eye" to compose the picture.
DeleteThat tripod thing looks like a" sprinkler" for watering the lawn. Perhaps!
ReplyDeleteMaybe it is!
DeleteThe contrast and the clarity of photos taken by the phone are often dissapointing for me.
ReplyDeleteI haven't had a problem with contrast or clarity. It's more the distortion of the lens.
DeleteNothing better than looking at old photos, we don't use our big cameras enough, they are bulky when bringing all the lens.
ReplyDeleteYeah, carrying all that equipment is such a drag! But it does make me feel more deliberate about my photography.
DeleteI sometimes wonder what the future will be like if all our photos are on our phones or wandering around in the cloud somewhere, there are no more old photo albums for future generations to browse through.
ReplyDeleteYeah, I wonder what will eventually happen with all our stored digital content long after we're dead. Surely it won't just hang around forever?
DeleteSuch great photos and memories. I’m now curious as to why Dave was watering someone else’s garden. And what about that tripod?
ReplyDeleteMaybe his parents actually planted the garden and the new owners weren't maintaining it as well? I think his parents had only recently sold the house. (I see now on Google Street View that the garden is gone entirely.)
DeleteLooking back on old photos that trigger good memories is something that makes me feel that life has been good, despite the occasional blips.
ReplyDeleteYours look like like happy memories in those photos.
Absolutely! I love old pictures, mine and everyone else's.
DeleteWe have the same discussions about iPhones and 'proper' cameras. I thought the tripod might be for a camera, actually.
ReplyDeleteIt's not mine, and I think I was the only one there with a camera! (And it was my little point-and-shoot.)
DeleteI laughed at Dave watering someone else's yard; I think it's both hilarious and kind.
ReplyDeleteIt is funny. It takes some nerve, considering at that point it wasn't his water or his hose!
DeleteThat picture of Dave saving plants that he doesn't own reminds me of someone else...a London guy...he always bringing home homeless plants, even if he has seventeen of that particular plant already...gees. What's his name? Right on the tip of my tongue...hold on...it will come to me...
ReplyDeleteYeah, who IS that crazy guy?! :)
DeleteI had the same thought as Debby. WHO was watering someone else's garden? And I agree with Frances- maybe a sprinkler, that tripod?
ReplyDeleteVery interesting contrast in that first picture. Nice.
I might have been the one who pointed out to Dave that the garden needed water. I can't remember!
DeleteI was thinking the same thing as Yael. What will happen to all of the electronic photos in the future that are being taken now? I guess it is the same as in the past before photography or like in my grandparents' days - we have very few photos from their era. Who will look at all of the photos we are trying to save?
ReplyDeleteI suppose it's inevitable that all but a small number will eventually vanish. My hope is that putting them online in a curated fashion (like here on my blog, where there is some context) will help some of them survive, at least until someone or something pulls the plug on the Internet.
DeleteThat's One Fabulous Shirt There Brother Man - Way Cool When Someone Engages In Conversation With Meaning - Rather Than Weather Or Favorite Footballer Or Something Else Completely Mundane - Speaking Of Completely , Finally Saw The Complete Unknown On The Big Screen And So Thankful That I Did - Enjoy The Rest Of Your Sunday
ReplyDeleteStay Groovy ,
Cheers
P.S. Lets Slip A Just Because Treat Under The Pink Blanket
It was a refreshing change from the normal party conversation!
DeleteWhen my great niece was here we looked through the old photo albums that my sister had, the ones we kept for Vickie to look through. When we were clearing out Pam's house last summer people looked through them then but I didn't, busy doing something else so I got to look through them too and found some pictures of me, the formal photos of me in my first wedding dress, the one published in the paper, taken before the wedding. And one picture of the guy I married. I have zero photos from that time, all lost over the years.
ReplyDeleteHow great that you were able to rediscover those photos!
DeleteI spent some time at my dad's house on Friday going through old photos (looking for one of him as a toddler because he looked so much like my great-nephew). Boy is that a time suck - I didn't have time to go down memory lane but I really wanted to!
ReplyDeleteYeah, and some people have a LOT of photos. Ahem...
DeleteThe tripod is definitely a sprinkler. You attach the hose to the think hanging down in the center.
ReplyDeleteReading history is a great way to appreciate the present.
Thing, not think. Dang it.
DeleteI'm glad you recognized it! Apparently they weren't running it since Dave felt the need to water by hand. (Maybe he disconnected the hose?)
DeleteWhat a great set of photos from the past. I love digging through the archives. I've been doing a lot of that lately myself.
ReplyDeleteInteresting comment about photo satisfaction. I love getting photos of birds and other wildlife which are only really successful with the bigger camera. My friends Julie and Dave are in Africa right now and they almost didn't take their big cameras with them. Julie changed her mind at the last minute because of the wildlife. I'm sure she will come home with some fantastic shots.
I took a point-and-shoot when I went to Africa and I got some OK shots, but nothing compared to my friends with their big cameras. A long lens is essential!
DeleteJust looking at that lush greenery and a garden that asks for watering makes me long for spring!
ReplyDeleteMe too! So much green!
DeleteReal 10lb cameras are better- they have soul and talent and see things better. Weight bearing exercise is supposed to be a good thing- and there is that wonderful telephoto lens. Can't beat a lens that can see all the way across the river, sharply and artfully and snooperly. Maybe find a better way to carry it. On your back maybe? Of course it is not a spontaneous activity...but you have your phone for that.
ReplyDeleteDave gave me a camera bag for my back, but the camera is so big it wouldn't fit! The shoulder bag isn't too bad but it wears a hole in my pants on my hip.
DeleteI have rarely gone back to look at anything on my blog. I realize things have changed and would be surprised at what I might see.
ReplyDeleteI don't look back much, unless I'm trying to figure out when a certain event happened or link to an earlier post.
DeleteI swore I would never use my phone as my primary camera, but...I've had to eat my words. It's so easy and the camera in it is excellent, especially with the iPhone 16 pro. I love your shirt too; it looks great!
ReplyDeleteIt's a good backup for day-to-day photography but I don't think I'll get rid of the big camera entirely.
DeleteThe photos on your blog are greatly appreciated. I always enjoy the content.
ReplyDeleteThat said, your big camera shows image detail the iPhone camera never captures.
Thank you! I shoot the camera photos in RAW mode, which preserves a greater dynamic range than a JPG. The phone shoots in HEIC which I then convert to JPG for posting.
DeleteYour mention of the ten pound camera bag reminded me of a trip over the Pond I took in 1981 with my parents and one year old son. My father had two (beloved) Hasselblad cameras with multiple lens, etc.--everything fit into a hard-sided Samsonite (avocado green!) suitcase with his own custom made interior. Every item had its own padded slot. Loaded, it weighed 35 pounds. He also had a standing tripod. You, living in London (where I grew up), know how many steps it takes to get around most Tube and/or railway stations including those up in Scotland. Or getting into buildings, etc.. Accessibility wasn't a thing in 1981. Not only did I have to lug my Dad's camera case and tripod up and over (railway lines) and down the other side or up and down tube station stairs, I then had to go back again to carry my son in his stroller and repeat the same journey. Everywhere we went. Dad wasn't physically well enough to manage the case (in fact, he died three years later). But, hey, that's why you bring the daughter along, right? He did take great photos and enjoyed himself tremendously--in the end, that's what was important.
ReplyDeleteMe? I use my iPhone.
Yikes! That sounds like a lot of work! But as you said, at least he got enjoyment from it and you have the satisfaction of knowing he didn't miss his camera on the trip. (And hopefully you have some good pictures as a souvenir!)
DeleteWhat I most love about photos is their ability to take me back to the moment they were taken. I can close my eyes and be back there. It's like a time-travel machine. Did the 2011 Dave and Steve have any idea of what lay ahead for them? :)
ReplyDeleteNot at all! I never imagined I'd be living in the UK, even just a four or five months before we moved.
DeleteYou had me dragging out the scales to weigh my camera, 15 ounces, camera and bag together, 1 pound 12 ounces. You must be referring to the enormous camera that reporters lug around when you mention a ten pound one. They have those long lenses like Pinocchio's nose.
ReplyDeleteYou can buy external cd/dvd players that plug into your laptop via usb cord/port
Yes, mine is a pro-quality camera like a press photog would use. And the lens is one of the big beige ones that Canon makes. (And not even the biggest -- not nearly!)
DeleteHaving had hard drives fail too over the years. You really should consider a cloud backup service. I pay $60 a year for mine and it automatically backs up all my hard drives to the cloud behind the scenes. It is nice because with an app on my phone, I can access the cloud and any picture in my collection from anywhere I have a cellphone or wifi connection. When I get a new computer, I just log into the cloud site, point it towards my new hard drive and it installs a copy of all my data on it while I work to install programs and such.
ReplyDeleteWell, I back up most pictures to Flickr as well as on hard drives and discs. I try to have a system of redundancy!
DeleteI'm searching for a small but very good digital I can carry in my bag. I've more or less given up my big camera (which was film and that's a hard find). My phone camera is bad but I need a new phone so that'll be a big requirement. Yes, I back up on an external and really should check out more of the cloud storage. I love seeing the old photos -- yours and mine, too. You're right about the memories -- a good day, a bad moment, a long lost friend. They all come to mind. I've been scanning lots of the old prints, passing them on to those in them and tossing the rest. Boy, digital is easy!
ReplyDeleteDigital is almost TOO easy. We have so many pictures nowadays -- but I imagine vast quantities of them get deleted when people take down Instagram and Facebook accounts or otherwise change their online lives.
DeleteI haven't shot film for years. Since the mid to late aughts, I think.